Some thoughts on touchscreen DJ’ing UX
A few friends sent me the following video by design student, Greg Werk, which some are heralding as the "future of DJ'ing"...
Multi Touch Light Table: GERGWERK from GERG WERK on Vimeo.
and here's another video demo that utilizes iPads.
Thoughts:
- Greg's description of having to haul all your gear to the club is very misleading. No self-respecting club would be without decks and a mixer. I also find it hard to imagine one digital DJ platform becoming the defacto standard for DJ'ing in the way that the Technics 1200s have for three decades now. One of the main advantages of a standard Technics setup is not having to worry about things like latency, version numbers, crashes, upgrades, etc As a DJ, you can be fairly confident that you'll have reliable tools to work with that have little variation from place to place. If touchscreen DJ'ing does take off, I imagine a variety of platforms competing against each other and since most DJs are particular about the tools they use, they'll probably want to bring their own setup rather than relying on the club.
- Greg rightfully calls out the flaw in having a flat surface from which the DJ has to focus their attention. Fixating down for long periods of time distances the DJ from the crowd so I found it confusing when the video illustrated a system that forces the DJ to look down at all times. A performer using a physical controller or mixer can usually control the gear blind once they've used it enough. The orientation of objects in 3D space provide something for the hands to bump into (sort of how most keyboards have a raised edge on the F and J keys) which allows the DJ more freedom in where they direct their eyes. Perhaps this could be mitigated in an all touchscreen based system if there were physical anchor points for the hands which guaranteed proper placement. Haptic feedback could help here as well.
- I don't recall if Greg mentioned this in the video, but if the interface is only displayed right in front of the DJ, facing upwards... then no one aside from the front row in the crowd will be able to see what the performer is doing (even then, they may have to do some extreme neck craning to get a glimpse of what's going on). One solution is to have the interface projected on the wall behind the DJ (similar to how cameras display the hands of turntablists in DMC battles), but unless the performer is doing a significant amount of manipulation, I can see the projection becoming quite dull after the initial "wow" factor wears off.
Artists like Daedelus have the right idea in using their instrument as a way of bringing the audience into the performance...
(jump to 2:45)I think any digital instrument that attempts to capture the feeling of an acoustic one (like that of a violinist), needs to have this element of transparency. In the absence of that, the performer just needs to be entertaining and crazy, a la Girl Talk...
- No touchscreen surface will provide the same level of tactile feedback as something with knobs and sliders. There is more fine grained control with physical objects... less chance for error due to mis-taps/swipes... and it just feels more physically satisfying.
- From a UX presentation standpoint, I have to hand it to Greg for putting together a compelling demo video. I particularly enjoyed the performance he gives at the end as he makes the system feel real by combining well timed hand movements with the demo playback on the screen.
- I also like the gestures he chose for controlling the virtual decks and mixer, but I think for the system to really shine, it needs to introduce concepts that would not be possible in any other DJ'ing platform. Things like looping, cue points, multiple effects are all available in various hardware mixers and digital packages like Serato and FinalScratch. What are the things a DJ could do that are uniquely well suited for a touch interface? Showcasing those will help make a much stronger case for this style of DJ'ing over more traditional and time-tested systems.
more thoughts on Autechre
-- The openers were a hip-hop DJ and a noise artist... very fitting since that's exactly the space Autechre sit right in between.
-- The club, La Machine, was gorgeous... perhaps the fanciest club I've ever been in. Which is hilarious since as soon as Autechre took the stage, all the lights were turned off. Their performance is about the space inside your head, not about them or anything else.
-- This was my 4th time to the see the band and the only one where the crowd didn't seem to thin out as time went on. The French clearly have a high tolerance for experimental music.
-- As I've written about before, enjoying an AE show is all about having the right mindset. There were no pauses in between tracks... no recognizable songs... basically nothing you'd find in a concert setting that allows you to latch onto something. It's truly a unique mental exercise in concentration.
-- Just as soon as you get into a groove and think you know what's going on with the music, they change it up... it's the equivalent of trying to hold water in your hand... just as soon as you think you have it, it starts to slip away. I love this aspect of their performance. This also makes it really hard to remember or describe the music that was experienced... it's completely fluid and evolving.
-- Another beautiful aspect of the show is looking around and observing other people in the audience... many have their eyes closed, some look exasperated, some are moving around to the music, others look like they just want to get the hell out of there. I posit this form of visual accompaniment to their music is more entertaining than the run of the mill screensaver visuals found at most electronic music shows.
Essentially what I want to say is that I think these guys are geniuses... they view sound as their giant sandbox to play around in... whether they acknowledge it or not, their art's connection to meditation and mindfulness is very inspiring and I thank the Gods that they exist and continue to make music.
















